| The
7 Never-to-be-Forgotten
Principles of Government
by Harry Browne
July 1, 2003
It's easy to think sometimes that a new government program, law,
or regulation could cure a pressing social problem.
Whether it's a desire to end abortions, keep the wrong people out
of the country, make your city drug-free, stop corporate frauds,
crack down on criminals, or make health care more accessible and
less expensive, you can imagine how the right new law could make
everything okay.
But when you get that kind of thought, I hope you'll remember the
seven principles that apply to all government programs — not
just the ones you oppose.
The Principles
1. Government is force. Every government program,
law, or regulation is a demand that someone do what he doesn't want
to do, refrain from doing what he does want to do, or pay for something
he doesn't want to pay for. And those demands are backed up by police
with guns.
You expect that force to be used only against the guilty. But we
can see how the Drug War, the foreign wars, asset forfeiture, the
Patriot Act, and other government activities have used force just
as often against the innocent — people who have not intruded
on anyone else's person or property.
In fact, government force is used more often against the innocent
than the guilty, because the guilty make it their business to understand
the laws that apply to them and stay clear of them. Meanwhile, the
innocent, thinking they've nothing to fear, suddenly find that they've
innocently violated laws they never heard of.
2. Government is politics. Whenever you turn over
to the government a financial, social, medical, military, or commercial
matter, it's automatically transformed into a political issue —
to be decided by those with the most political influence. And that
will never be you or I.
Politicians don't weigh their votes on the basis of ideology or
social good. They think in terms of political power.
3. You don't control government. It's easy to
think of the perfect law that will stop the bad guys while leaving
the good guys unhindered. But no law will be written the way you
have in mind, it won't be administered the way you have in mind,
and it won't be adjudicated the way you have in mind.
Your ideal law will be written by politicians for political purposes,
administered by bureaucrats for political purposes, and adjudicated
by judges appointed for political purposes. So don't be surprised
if the new law turns out to do exactly the opposite of what you
thought you were supporting.
4. Every government program will be more expensive and
more expansive than anything you had in mind when you proposed it.
It will be applied in all sorts of ways you never dreamed of.
When Medicare was initially passed in 1965, the politicians projected
its cost in 1992 to be $3 billion — which is equivalent to
$12 billion when adjusted for inflation to 1992 dollars. The actual
cost in 1992 was $110 billion — nine times as much.
And when Medicare was enacted, Section 1801 of the original law
specifically prohibited any bureaucratic interference with the practice
of medicine. Today not one word of that protection still applies.
The federal government owns the health-care industry lock, stock,
and barrel.
The new program you support will eventually include all sorts of
powers and privileges you can't even imagine right now.
5. Power will always be misused. Give good people
the power to do good and that power eventually will be in the hands
of bad people to do bad.
As Michael Cloud has pointed out, "The problem isn't the abuse
of power; it's the power to abuse." Give politicians power
and it certainly will be abused eventually — if not by today's
politicians, then by their successors.
As P.J. O'Rourke said, "Giving money and power to politicians
is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys."
6. Government doesn't work. Because government
is force, because government programs are designed to enrich the
politically powerful, because you can't control government and make
it do what's right, because every new government program soon wanders
from its original purpose, and because politicians eventually misuse
the power you give them, it is inevitable that no government program
will deliver on the promises the politicians make for it.
For years, I've asked listeners during radio interviews to name
a government program that has actually delivered on its promises,
and no one has been able to do so.
If you think there's a successful government program, you probably
don't know how much it actually costs, aren't aware of all its destructive
side-effects, have no idea how easily and inexpensively such a thing
could be done outside of government, and/or are basing your view
of its success on political propaganda.
It doesn't matter whether a program is supposed to do something
you want or something you don't want, whether the program is something
you consider a proper function of government or something beyond
its limits. It won't work. Government programs always wind up disappointing
you.
7. Government must be subject to absolute limits.
Because politicians have every incentive to expand government, and
with it their power, there must be absolute limits on government.
The Constitution provides the obvious limits we must reimpose upon
the federal government. Until the Constitution is enforced, we have
no hope of containing the federal government.
The present system of unlimited power is like giving a drunken
stranger a set of signed, blank checks on your bank account. You
are reduced to relying on the honesty and integrity of people you
don't even know — and they abuse that trust again and again.
Whether you think government should be bigger or smaller than the
limits specified in the Constitution, the first step is to restore
absolute limits, and then — if you like — work to change
those limits to ones that would be more to your liking.
Questions
So the next time you're tempted to think that some government program
is just what this country needs, ask yourself these questions:
Do I really want to use force to make this happen? Do I have any
idea how many families may be destroyed by giving the government
another tool to be enforced with fines and prison terms?
Do I really believe that George Bush, Teddy Kennedy, Hillary Clinton,
and Trent Lott will have my best interests at heart when they fashion
this new program or law?
Why should I believe supporting this program will lead to exactly
the solution I believe is right — when I have no way to control
the outcome?
Do I really think the politicians won't expand the scope and cost
of this program far beyond what they're talking about today?
Do I really want to give politicians this kind of power —
knowing that some day the politicians and party I don't like will
have it at their disposal?
Why in the world should I think this government program will work
any better than any government program of the past?
How can I hope to bring about small, limited government when I'm
suggesting a new government program that will take us further away
from the Constitution?
Conclusion
If you really want to cure a pressing social problem, take steps
outside the realm of government. If you don't see how you can convince
people to help you succeed in a non-governmental endeavor, how can
you expect to control politicians who care nothing for your desires?
And if you really want to make a noticeable difference, if you
really want to improve life, do something for yourself or your family
today. That's where you have real control, that's where you don't
need to rely on politicians — or anyone else — and you
can make sure the results are as you intend.
back
|